Back now
Well, we're back. It was, on the whole, a much nicer trip than expected. The funeral itself was pretty short (and for a death-fixated religion, the Christians sure do crap funeral rituals, but I plan to rant about that separately...) and, I think, good for the closest grieving. We then went to see Jenny's paternal grandmother, who looked much better than she did last time we saw her. She's still one of the most amazingly positive people I've ever met, so it's nice visiting her. We then spent another night at Jenny's father's, which was also surprisingly pleasant. Only a very small amount of dodging subjects had to be done. On the way home today we stopped to see Thina, the wheelchair-bound dressage-rider who visited us over midsummer, and her hyperactive dogs (who are flat-coat retrievers, I have now been informed). Which was also fun.
And now we're at home and the cats are pretending to ignore us.
And now we're at home and the cats are pretending to ignore us.
no subject
This wasn't the only Christian funeral I've been to, only the first one since I started working as a priest. And the major flaw (IMO, and apart from all the things I don't like about Christianity in general, of course) was the near-total lack of attention to the grieving people left behind. The ceremony as it was might have made a decent middle third of a proper ritual, but standing by itself as it did it severely lacked in several respects.
no subject
Hmmm, yes, I can see the possible problem there -- especially depending on how much the attendance required participation and the participation required what might be construed as "bowing down to foriegn gods" so to speak.
the major flaw... was the near-total lack of attention to the grieving people left behind
In what sense, exactly?
no subject
no subject
no subject
I've already left instructions with my lawyer that my memorial service is to be a party, with birthday cake and salted nuts and my CD of U2 music played by string quartet. :)
no subject
no subject
Or maybe I'm just confused by the idea of us as 'death-fixated'. I wouldn't have said we think much about death at all; we think about resurrection, and being reunited with God.
no subject
First, get some kind of detectable beginning and end. Playing music while people enter the church and sit down really doesn't give a sense of "The ceremony is starting now". And almost any end at all would be better than the priest ceasing to talk and people milling around aimlessly! Second, drop the speaker/audience relationship, at least when the speaker is not the priest. Those who speak their memories of a recently dead close one don't need a spotlight and a distance, they need human closeness and a hug. Third, drop the schedule. Grief does not run to a timetable, so don't force people to speak according to one (or even in a predetermined order). Let words and tears come as they will.
AFAIK, none of that is incompatible with your beliefs. I even think there are (or at least have been) Christian variants that do things pretty much like that.
I wouldn't have said we think much about death at all; we think about resurrection, and being reunited with God.
Resurrection requires dying first. You reunite with your God after you die. The rewards and punishments offered by your God to make you behave as he likes are mainly to be delivered after you've died. The big thing your saviour did was to become human and die. You use the cross, the instrument of his execution, as your most important symbol. A requirement to reach the highest state available to a human, sainthood, is that the saint-to-be is dead. You may see it as being focused on what comes after death, but for someone who does not share your beliefs the difference between that and focussing on death is very hard to see.
no subject
Yes, intellectually I can see the pattern, when you list all those things together. But the way I feel when you say it is more like, we've been looking forward to a present and you're accusing us of focusing on the box that it comes in.
FWIW, some of the things you list aren't unique to Christianity: psychology tells us that all people think about death, and the belief in reuniting with God after death in some form or other is common to several religions; in fact, I'd have said that all religions are about achieving some perceived form of immortality by connecting with the beyond. Also, some of the things you list are denominational: many of us don't allow the use of the cross as a symbol, or elevate people to 'sainthood' after they die.
Well, as usual, you've given me much to think about, and I do appreciate it. Thank you.
no subject
This wasn't the only Christian funeral I've been to, only the first one since I started working as a priest. And the major flaw (IMO, and apart from all the things I don't like about Christianity in general, of course) was the near-total lack of attention to the grieving people left behind. The ceremony as it was might have made a decent middle third of a proper ritual, but standing by itself as it did it severely lacked in several respects.
I've been to a few Christian funerals recently. Of them all, I thought that my Nana's funeral was the one that was done well. The long journey from the village church to Grandad's grave in Sheffield maybe broke things up a little too much, even though it couldn't be helped. I thought that the stories from Nana's life that the Rector picked out were very appropriate. And holoding the wake at a pub was totally appropriate to who she had ben in life.