Testing...

[cdybedahl]

Comments

[pinkdormouse.livejournal.com]

Cuteness.

Have I passed the test? ;-)

Gina

[cdybedahl.livejournal.com]

I don't know. Did you get a 682x384 pixel image with a sort of logo in the lower right corner, or a 1365x768 pixel image without the logo?

[cangetmad.livejournal.com]

A cyberpomo logo? I get that. Should I get that?

[cdybedahl.livejournal.com]

Yup. I've re-done the deeplinking protection so that instead of the big ugly picture they got before the bandwidth thieves will get a shrunk version of the real image with a logo on it. And apparently it's working as intended.

[pinkdormouse.livejournal.com]

I like it when things work as planned.

Gina

[cangetmad.livejournal.com]

That's profoundly kick-ass. Will you be making the script you used public? Sound like a neat idea for so many sites.

[cdybedahl.livejournal.com]

It's nowhere near publishable, unfortunately. My entire site relies heavily on the facts that I'm the only user on it and that nobody else will ever have to maintain the code on it.

It's fairly trivial code anyway...

[zonereyrie.livejournal.com]

I got the HUGE image.

But I also set my Mozilla to ONLY send HTTP_REFERER on clicks and NOT when fetching embedded images.

[cdybedahl.livejournal.com]

Yeah, people with no referer at all get the real image. Preventing that is a bit nastier than I want to be, in this case.

[trixieleitz]

I see cute people!

(small, plus logo, with Opera 7.1 under Win2k)