Yup. I've re-done the deeplinking protection so that instead of the big ugly picture they got before the bandwidth thieves will get a shrunk version of the real image with a logo on it. And apparently it's working as intended.
It's nowhere near publishable, unfortunately. My entire site relies heavily on the facts that I'm the only user on it and that nobody else will ever have to maintain the code on it.
![[identity profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/openid.png){kind=small}
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
branchandroot
(no subject)
Date: 2003-05-26 04:48 am (UTC)Have I passed the test? ;-)
Gina
(no subject)
Date: 2003-05-26 05:06 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2003-05-26 05:18 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2003-05-26 05:27 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2003-05-26 05:38 am (UTC)Gina
(no subject)
Date: 2003-05-26 05:40 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2003-05-26 05:56 am (UTC)It's fairly trivial code anyway...
(no subject)
Date: 2003-05-26 03:08 pm (UTC)But I also set my Mozilla to ONLY send HTTP_REFERER on clicks and NOT when fetching embedded images.
(no subject)
Date: 2003-05-26 03:16 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2003-05-27 11:44 am (UTC)(small, plus logo, with Opera 7.1 under Win2k)